Document Type : Short Communication

Author

University of Michigan

10.52293/WES.4.2.15

Abstract

The article delves into the overlooked long-term repercussions of oil spills on water ecosystems, particularly focusing on microbial communities and environmental recovery post-disasters. Highlighting five major US oil spills, it unveils how crude oil's enduring effects persist well beyond initial cleanup, impacting microbial foundations crucial for ecosystem health. As global energy demands surge, petroleum remains a primary source, emphasizing the dire environmental consequences of spills during transportation. While immediate impacts on species are extensively studied, the report probes into the extended aftermath, spotlighting the harm to marine phytoplankton—essential for Earth's carbon cycle.



Revelations from disasters like the Exxon Valdez and Deepwater Horizon unveil remnants of crude oil that endure for decades, undermining microbial communities and hindering ecosystem revival. Such residues, trapped in sediments, disrupt oxygen and nutrient levels, impeding microbial degradation and slowing removal rates. Harmful algae blooms proliferate, disrupting ecosystems and posing risks to marine life and human health. The article emphasizes the cyclical harm: oil's persistence weakens beneficial microbes, exacerbating future damage from subsequent stressors.



Examining compounded environmental disasters showcases the lasting impact on coastlines, with shoreline retreat and marsh ecosystem losses doubling post-spill. Such crises, examined through the lens of Hurricane Katrina's legacy, amplify erosion rates, permanently altering recovery baselines. The article underscores the need for intervention strategies, emphasizing the importance of replenishing microbial communities and reevaluating recovery tactics post-spills. It advocates for a shift towards cleaner energy sources to mitigate further harm to water ecosystems.

Keywords

 

OPEN ACCESS

©2024 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

Forscher Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Forscher Publisher

 

Letters to Editor

WES Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in WES should be sent to the editorial office of WES within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.
Doman L. U.S. Energy Information Administration - EIA - Independent Statistics and Analysis. Factors Affecting Gasoline Prices - Energy Explained, Your Guide To Understanding Energy - Energy Information Administration. 2017 Sep 14 [accessed 2022 Sept 25]. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=32912
Falkowski, P. (2012). Ocean Science: The power of plankton. Nature, 483(7387), S17–S20. https://doi.org/10.1038/483s17a
Vandana, Priyadarshanee, M., Mahto, U., & Das, S. (2022). Mechanism of toxicity and adverse health effects of environmental pollutants. Microbial Biodegradation and Bioremediation, 2, 33–53. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-85455-9.00024-2
Allison, E., & Mandler, B. (2018). Transportation of Oil, Gas, and Refined Products The methods, volumes, risks, and regulation of oil and gas transportation. In American Geosciences. https://www.americangeosciences.org/sites/default/files/AGI_PE_Transportation_web_final.pdf
Fisher, C., Montagna, P., & Sutton, T. (2016). How Did the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Impact Deep-Sea Ecosystems? Oceanography, 29(3), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2016.82
Falkowski, P. (2012). Ocean Science: The power of plankton. Nature, 483(7387), S17–S20. https://doi.org/10.1038/483s17a
Allin, C. W. (2011). Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues: Vol. Rev. ed. Salem Press.Bioremediation, 2, 33–53. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-85455-9.00024-2
Lindeberg, M. R., MasVandana, Priyadarshanee, M., Mahto, U., & Das, S. (2022). Mechanism of toxicity and adverse health effects of environmental pollutants. Microbial Biodegradation and 10.1073/pnas.1204922109. 
Mishra, Deepak R., et al. “Post-Spill State of the Marsh: Remote Estimation of the Ecological Impact of the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill on Louisiana Salt Marshes.” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 118, 2012, pp. 176–185., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.007. 
Center for Ocean Management Studies. (1979). In the wake of the argo merchant: Proceedings of a symposium held January 11-13, 1978, Center for Ocean Management Studies, Unelko, J., Heintz, R. A., Fugate, C. J., & Holland, L. (2018). Conditions of persistent oil on beaches in Prince William sound 26 years after the Exxon Valdez Spill. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 147, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2017.07.011 
Wiens, J. A. (2018). Recovery of seabirds following the Exxon Valdez oil spill: An overview. Exxon Valdez Oil Spill: Fate and Effects in Alaskan Waters. https://doi.org/10.1520/stp19883s 
Clement, T. P., & John, G. F. (2022). A perspective on the State of Deepwater Horizon oil spill related Tarball contamination and its impacts on Alabama Beaches. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 36, 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2022.100799 
Silliman, Brian & van de Koppel, Johan & McCoy, Michael & Diller, Jessica & Kasozi, Gabriel & Earl, Kamala & Adams, Peter & Zimmerman, Andrew. (2012). Degradation and resilience in Louisiana salt marshes after the BP-Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 109. 11234-9. 
Cruz, A. M., & Krausmann, E. (2009). Hazardous-materials releases from offshore oil and gas facilities and emergency response following Hurricanes Katrina and rita. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2008.08.007 
Deis, D. R., Mendelssohn, I. A., Fleeger, J. W., Bourgoin, S. M., & Lin, Q. (2019). Legacy effects of Hurricane Katrina influenced marsh shoreline erosion following the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Science of The Total Environment, 672, 456–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.023 
Otten, J. G., Williams, L., & Refsnider, J. M. (2022). Survival outcomes of rehabilitated riverine turtles following a freshwater diluted bitumen oil spill. Environmental Pollution, 311. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4135047 
Kalamazoo River Disaster. Sierra Club. (n.d.). Retrieved September 23, 2022, from https://www.sierraclub.org/michigan/kalamazoo-river-disaster 
Quigg, A., Parsons, M., Bargu, S., Ozhan, K., Daly, K. L., Chakraborty, S., Kamalanathan, M., Erdner, D., Cosgrove, S., & Buskey, E. J. (2021). Marine phytoplankton responses to oil and dispersant exposures: Knowledge gained since the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 164, 112074. Science Direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112074
Sargian, P., Mas, S., Pelletier, É., & Demers, S. (2007). Multiple stressors on an Antarctic microplankton assemblage: water soluble crude oil and enhanced UVBR level at Ushuaia (Argentina). Polar Biology, 30(7), 829–841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-006-0243-1
Lee, W. Y., & Nicol, J. A. C. (1977). The effects of the water soluble fractions of No. 2 fuel oil on the survival and behaviour of coastal and oceanic zooplankton. Environmental Pollution (1970), 12(4), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-9327(77)90022-2
YoungDyke, D. (2017, June 9). Seven Years Later, Kalamazoo River Oil Spill Cleanup Still Ongoing. National Wildlife Federation. https://www.nwf.org/Latest-News/Press-Releases/2017/6-9-17-Seven-Years-Later-Kalamazoo-River-Oil-Spill-Cleanup-Still-Ongoing