Document Type : ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE

Authors

1 University of Connecticut

2 Former fellow of the Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Ecuador

10.52293/WES.3.4.1420

Abstract

Water ecosystem services are benefits obtained from natural processes held by terrestrial vegetation in relation to hydrologic systems. These benefits have implications for human wellbeing through the mitigation of flood risk, management of stormwater runoff, and removal of pollutants from water systems that ultimately supply drinking and irrigation water. Assessing national and regional stocks of these important ecosystem services is crucial for the sustainable development of the land and for conservation purposes. In this study, we applied three models from the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) tool to map the production of flash-flood risk mitigation, stormwater retention, and nitrogen retention. Our findings were consistent with impact assessments on local communities. Through the three ecosystem services mapped, we demonstrated the role of existing terrestrial vegetation in processing hydrologic systems in the Republic of Ecuador. The results from this modeling also provided insights into potential planning pathways for future management using the InVEST software.

Keywords

OPEN ACCESS

©2023 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

PUBLISHER NOTE

Forscher Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CURRENT PUBLISHER

Forscher Publisher

 

Letters to Editor

WES Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in WES should be sent to the editorial office of WES within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.
Brauman, K. A. (2015). Hydrologic ecosystem services: linking ecohydrologic processes to human well‐being in water research and watershed management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 2(4), 345-358.
Brauman, K. A., Daily, G. C., Duarte, T. K., & Mooney, H. A. (2007). The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 32, 67-98.
Bucherie, A., Hultquist, C., Adamo, S., Neely, C., Ayala, F., Bazo, J., & Kruczkiewicz, A. (2022). A comparison of social vulnerability indices specific to flooding in Ecuador: Principal component analysis (PCA) and expert knowledge. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 73, 102897.
Esri. (2022). ArcGIS Pro 3.0.0. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynaud, A., & Cardoso, A. C. (2016). Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management. Environmental Science & Policy, 61, 194-203.
Guerry, A. D., Ruckelshaus, M. H., Arkema, K. K., Bernhardt, J. R., Guannel, G., Kim, C. K., … & Spencer, J. (2012). Modeling benefits from nature: using ecosystem services to inform coastal and marine spatial planning. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 8(1-2), 107-121.
 
Huffman, G. J., Stocker, E. F., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., & Jackson T. (2019). GPM IMERG Final Precipitation L3 1 month 0.1 degree x 0.1 degree V06. Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC).
Jacobsen, D., & Encalada, A. (1998). The macroinvertebrate fauna of Ecuadorian highland streams in the wet and dry season. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, 142, 53-70.
Larrea, C. (2013). Extractivism, economic diversification and prospects for sustainable development in Ecuador. Latin America and Shifting Sands of Global Power (pp. 11-12). Canberra: Australia National University.
Montoya, A. G., Vizuete, D. C., Toaza, J. M., Marcu, M. V., & Borz, S. A. (2019). Importance and use of ecosystem services provided by the Amazonian landscapes in Ecuador-evaluation and spatial scaling of a representative area. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, 12(61), 1-26.
Natural Capital Project. (2022). InVEST 3.13.0.post5+ug.gce76c6e User’s Guide. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, Chinese Academy of Sciences, The Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund, and Stockholm Resilience Centre.
Obaco, M., & Díaz-Sánchez, J. P. (2018). Urbanization in Ecuador: An overview using the FUA definition. Documents de Treball (IREA), 14(1).
United Nations’ Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs – Latin America and the Caribbean. (2020). Ecuador – Subnational Administrative Boundaries. Humanitarian Data Exchange v1.61.1. https://data.humdata.org/dataset/cod-ab-ecu
Reid, W. V., Mooney, H. A., Cropper, A., Capistrano, D., Carpenter, S. R., Chopra, K., & ... & Zurek, M. B. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being-Synthesis: A report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press.
 
Rodriguez Gonzalez, M. I., & Torres Garrido, K. G. (2023). An update on Ecuador’s national carbon assessment, and its relationship with protected areas and Indigenous Peoples. South Sustainability, 4(1), e067-e067.
Ross, C. W., Prihodko, L., Anchang, J., Kumar, S., Ji, W., & Hanan, N. P. (2018). HYSOGs250m, global gridded hydrologic soil groups for curve-number-based runoff modeling. Scientific data, 5(1), 1-9.
Salvia, A. L., Leal Filho, W., Brandli, L. L., & Griebeler, J. S. (2019). Assessing research trends related to Sustainable Development Goals: Local and global issues. Journal of cleaner production, 208, 841-849.
Secretaría Nacional del Agua. (2011). Clasificación de cuencas hidrográficas nivel 5 según metodología Pfafstetter.
Shade, L. (2015). Sustainable development or sacrifice zone? Politics below the surface in post-neoliberal Ecuador. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2(4), 775-784.
Souris, M. (2018). Ecuador DEMs. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement. http://www.savgis.org/ecuador.htm
United Stated Department of Agriculture – Natural Resources Conservation Service. (2007). Hydrologic Soil-Cover Complexes, in Part 603 Hydrology: National Engineering Handbook.
Tallis, H., & Polasky, S. (2009). Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural‐resource management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162(1), 265-283.
United Nations’ Environment Programme, and the International Union for Conservation of Nature. (2020). World Database on Protected Areas.
World Bank. (2023). Average precipitation in depth (mm per year) – Ecuador. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/AG.LND.PRCP.MM?locations=EC
Zanaga, D., Van De Kerchove, R., De Keersmaecker, W., Souverijns, N., Brockmann, C., Quast, R., Wevers, J., Grosu, A., Paccini, A., Vergnaud, S., Cartus, O., Santoro, M., Fritz, S., Georgieva, I., Lesiv, M., Carter, S., Herold, M., Li, Linlin, Tsendbazar, N.E., Ramoino, F., Arino, O., 2021. ESA WorldCover 10 m 2020 v100.