1 Expert in the protection and exploitation of surface water، Regional water company of CHB

2 Department of Natural Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord City, Iran



Curve number is a dimensionless empirical method for predicting direct runoff. Since river discharge and sediment load are highly connected thus the relationship between runoff and bed load could be used to evaluate the continuous sediment load. This study proposes a new curve number that characterizes this parameter based on redefined lookup tables and a fuzzy approach for calculating sediment load. The developed distributed monthly Fuzzy Curve Number Sediment Simulation(CNS2) in Python was applied to predict runoff and sediment load using the rating curve concept. The model uses the fuzzy curve number and some factors such as the number of rainy days, the management of RUSLE-3D, slope, teta coefficient, and soil texture for simulating sediment load at a monthly time scale. The results of model sensitivity analysis indicated that rainfall, base-flow and runoff were the most critical factors affecting sediment load in the study area of interest. The Nash-Sutcliff index evaluated the effectiveness of the simulated runoff; the calculated metric value was 0.6 and 0.53 during two calibration and validation periods, respectively. The Nash-Sutcliff index for simulated sediment load was 0.54 and 0.43 during the calibration and validation periods, respectively. The distributed structure of the developed model provides the possibility for improving estimating spatial variability of sediment yield over the basins; therefore, it can capture the heterogeneity in affecting factors for sediment production.



©2023 The author(s). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit:


Forscher Publisher remains neutral concerning jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


Forscher Publisher


Letters to Editor

WES Journal welcomes letters to the editor for the post-publication discussions and corrections which allows debate post publication on its site, through the Letters to Editor. Letters pertaining to manuscript published in WES should be sent to the editorial office of WES within three months of either online publication or before printed publication, except for critiques of original research. Following points are to be considering before sending the letters (comments) to the editor.

[1] Letters that include statements of statistics, facts, research, or theories should include appropriate references, although more than three are discouraged.
[2] Letters that are personal attacks on an author rather than thoughtful criticism of the author’s ideas will not be considered for publication.
[3] Letters can be no more than 300 words in length.
[4] Letter writers should include a statement at the beginning of the letter stating that it is being submitted either for publication or not.
[5] Anonymous letters will not be considered.
[6] Letter writers must include their city and state of residence or work.
[7] Letters will be edited for clarity and length.
  • Abdollahi K. Bashir I. Verbeiren B. Harouna M. R. Griensven A. V. Huysmans M. Batelaan O. 2017. A distributed monthly water balance model: formulationand application on Black Volta Basin. Ph.D. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
  • Abdollahi, K. 2015. Basin scale water balance modeling for variable hydrological regimes and temporal scales. Ph.D. Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Belgium.
  • Alizadeh, A. 2012. Principles of applied hydrology. Imam Reza university press. P. 45-46 (In Persian).
  • Akyurck, Z. Okalp, K. 2006. A fuzzy-based tool for spatial reasoning A case study on soil erosion hazard prediction. 7th International Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environ. Sci., p.235-245.
  • Akbari, A. Azizan, A. S. and Ngien, S. K. 2016. Effect of slope Adjustment on curve number using global digital elevation data: new look into Sharply-Willimas and Huang method. Second International Conference on Science, Engineering & Environment. Osaka City. Japan. Nov.21-23. ISBN: 978-4-9905958-7-6 C3051.
  • Arnold, J. G. Muttiah, R. S. Srinivasan, R. Allen, PM. 2000. Regionalestimation of base-flow and groundwater recharge in the Upper Mississippi river basin. J Hydrol 227(1): 21–40.
  • Batelaan, O. De Smedt, F. 2001. WetSpass: a flexible, GIS based,distributed recharge methodology for regional ground water modeling. vol 269. IAHS Publication. P. 11–18.
  • Changying, J. Junzheng, P.2000. Fuzzy prediction of soil strength based on water content and composition. J. Terramechanics. 37 (2):57-63.
  • Chang, Y.H.O and Ayyub, B.M .2001. Fuzzy Regression Methods-A Comparative Assessment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 119(2): 187-203.
  • Cronshey R. 1986. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Technical release United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering Division 210-VT-TR-55,Second Ed, United States, 164.
  • De Groen, M.M. 2002. Modeling interception and transpiration atmonthly time steps introducing daily variability through Markovchains. Ph.D. Dissertation, IHE-Delft. Swets and Zeitlinger,Lisse, The Netherlands.
  • De Groen, MM. and Savenije, HH. 2006. A monthly interception equationbased on the statistical characteristics of daily rainfall. WaterResour Res, 42(12):W12417. doi:10.1029/2006WR005013.
  • Fan, F. L. Deng, Y. B. Hu, X. F. and Weng, Q. H. 2013. Estimating Composite Curve Number Using on Improved SCS-CN Method with Remotely Sensed Variables in Guangzhon, china. Remote Sensing. 5:1425-1438.
  • 1994. UNDP and UNEP, Land degradation in south Asia: 1ts severity, causes and effects upon the people, World Soil Resources. Report No, 78, FAO, Rome.
  • Ferraro, D. O. 2009. Fuzzy knowledge-based model for soil condition assessment in Argentinean cropping systems. Environmental Modelling & Software. 24(3):359-370.
  • Ferguson, B.K. 1996. Estimation of Direct Runoff in the Thornthwaite Water Balance.University of Georgia. 48 (3): 263-271.
  • Gerosa, G. A. Mereu, S. Finco, A. Marzuoli, R. 2012. Stomatal conductance modeling to estimate the evapotranspiration of natural and agricultural ecosystems. Evapotranspiration-Remote sensing and modeling. InTech. p.403-420.
  • Goktepe A. B. Altun, S. Sezer, A. 2005. Soil clustering by fuzzy c-means algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software, 36(9), pp. 691-698.
  • Gundalia, M. and Dholakia, M. 2014. Impact of Monthly Curve Number on Daily Runoff Estimation for Ozat Catchment in India. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology. 4: 144-155.
  • Kang, Sh. Hao, X. Ding, R. Tong,L. Li, F. Zhang Y. 2014. Variations of crop coefficient and its influencing factors in an arid advective cropland of northwest China. Hydrological processes, 29 (2): 239-249.
  • Kisi, O. Karahan, M. E. and Sen, Z. 2006. River Suspended Sediment Modeling Using a Fuzzy Logic Approach. Hydrological Processes.20: 4351-4362.
  • Kisi, O. 2016. A new approach for modeling suspended sediment: Evolutionary fuzzy approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. p.1-41.
  • Knight, C.G. Chang,H. Staneva, M.P. and Kostov, D. 2001. A Simplified Basin Model For Simulating Runoff: The Struma River GIS. Professional Geogr. 53 (4):533–545.
  • Lee, G. S. LeeK. H. 2006. Application of fuzzy representation of geographic boundary to the soil loss model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. Discuss. 3: 115-133.
  • LotfiZadeh, A. 1965. Fuzzy sets and systems. In:Fax J, editor. System Theory. Brooklyn, NY:Polytechnic Press. p.29-39.
  • Loukas, A. Vasiliades, L. Domenikiotis, C. and Dalezios, N.R. 2005. Basin-Wide Actual Evapotranspiration Estimation Using NOOA/AVHRR Satellite Data. Phys. Chem. Earth. P.30.
  • Mitra, B. Scott,H. D. Dixon,J. C McKimmey,J. M. 1999. Applications of fuzzy logic to the prediction of soil erosion in a large watershed. Geoderma. 86:183-209.
  • Mishra, S.K. Chaudhary, A. Shrestha, R.K. Pandeym A. Lal, M. 2014. Experimental verification of the effect of Slope and Landuse on SCS Runoff Curve Number. Water Resour Manage. 28:3407-3416.
  • Mishra, S.K. Singh Vijay, P. Sansalone, J.J. Aravamuthan, V. 2003. A modified SCS-CN method:characterization and testing. Water Resources Management. 17 (1):37-68.
  • Mohseni, O. and Stefan, H. G.1998. A monthly streamflow model. Water Resources Research. 34(5): 1287-1298.
  • Nash J.E. and Sutcliffe J.V. 1979. River flow forecasting through conceptual model. Journal of Hydrology. 10:282-290.
  • Neitsch, S. L. Arnold, J. G. .Kiniry, J. R. Williams, J. R. .King, W. K. 2002. Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Theoretical Documentation. Blackland Research Center. Texas. Agricultural Experimental Station.
  • Pistocchi, A. Bouraoui, F. Bittelli, M. 2008. A simplified parameterization of the monthly topsoilwaterbudget. WaterResour Res;44:W12440. doi:10.1029/2007WR006603.
  • Runkui Li. Xiaoping Rui. A-Xing Zhu. Junzhi Liu. Lawrence E. Band. Xianfeng Song. 2014. Increasing detail of distributed runoff modeling using fuzzy logic in curve number, Envirom Earth Sci. p. 1-9.
  • Shakouri, H. Nadimi, G. R. Ghaderi, F. 2007. Fuzzy linear regression models with absolute errors and optimum uncertainty. IEEE Internat. Conf. Industrial Engineering and Engineering Manage. p. 917-921.
  • Sorooshian, S. and Gupta, V.j. 1983. Automatic calibration of conceptual Rainfall-Runoff Models: The question of Parameter observation and unquenss. Water Resurces Research. 19 (1):260-268.
  • Soulis, K.X. and Valiantzas, J.D. 2012. SCS-CN Parameter Determination Using Rainfall-Runoff Data in Heterogeneous Watersheds: The two-CN System Approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16:1001-1015.
  • Soil Conservation Service, USDA. 1985. National Engineering Handbook, 210-VI. Part630, Chapter7, Hydrologic Soil-Cover Complex. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
  • Sutanto, SJ. Wenninger,J. Coenders-Gerrits, AMJ. Uhlenbrook, S. 2012. Partitioning of evaporation into transpiration, soil evaporation and interception: a comparison between isotope measurements and a HYDRUS-1D model”, Hydrol Earth SystSc 16(8): 2605–2616. doi:10.5194/hess-16-2605-2012.
  • Tran, L. T. DucksteinL. 2001. Multiobjective fuzzy Regression with central tendency and possibilistic properties. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. Catena. 47: 305-322.
  • Tomer, S. K. 2011. Python in Hydrology. Green Tea Press. p.1-218. The book is translated into Persian by Mr. Moslem Heydari and is in print by Jihad Agriculture press of Shahrekord University, Iran.
  • Turc, L. bilan, Le. l’eau, de. sols, des. 1955. Relationships entre les precipitations, l’evaporationetl’ecoulement. INRA, Paris. p.252.
  • Walling,D. E. 1977. Limitations of the ratingcurve technique for estimating suspended sediment loads, with particular reference to British rivers, Erosion and Solute Matter Transport in Inland Waters. P. 34-38.
  • Williams, G. 1989. Sediment concentration versus water discharge during single hydrologic events in rivers, Journal of Hydrology 111. p. 89-106.
  • Wang, Z. Batelaan, O. and DeSmedt, F.1997. Adistributed model for water and energy transfer between soil, plants and atmosphere (Wetspa).Physics and chemistry of the earth. 21:189-193.
  • Wischmeier W.H. and Smith, D.D. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: a guide to conservationplanning. Agriculture Handbook No. 537. US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC.